The literature review of an assignment paper debates different topics or different areas of any specific subject presenting all the collected knowledge in a structured manner by an individual writer or by a group or with the help of experts who write the literature review report.
The literature review writing of a research paper is a full set of documents all of which are engaged in the state of the art along with giving respect towards that particular subject matter or literature topic about what the review is written about.
The structure of a literature review forms an appropriate frame that helps the readers for understanding how the literature’s elements tie them all together. There is no significant set of length while writing a literature paper related to literature reviews.
In this regard, plagiarism is a term which is the idea of some other people incorporating some other person into their work without the full acknowledgement of the original writer and this should definitely be avoided.
A literature review of any thesis or dissertation writing a research paper is a lengthy piece of academic writing that is based on original research. It is primarily formed, analysed then submitted critically since it is an essential part of the undergraduate and postgraduate degrees.
The writing of a research paper-related literature review mainly involves a paradox process concerning the literature study analysis. Another thing that a literature review for an assignment paper provides is that it will improve the methodology section of the dissertation.
This is the time when along with this, it presents a broad and wide knowledgeable ground depending on the subject area of the literature review. Apart from this, the students might also perform plagiarism because of their lack of proper writing skills or subject-related knowledge in them.
The tables, graphs, charts, and other things created while the literature review process is being conducted are majorly considered along with huge and numerous limitations. The literature review primarily conducts and helps in structuring and proving the knowledge, point to point being relevant to the subject field regarding which the literature needs reviewing.
The structure of a normal literature review is just like any other structure of an essay which must include a few things such as a proper introduction, the main body, and a summarised conclusion with a recommendation.
The introduction section contains all the background-related information, the body of the review contains the overall discussion of all the information sources, a conclusion summarises a short collection of all the discussion and a recommendation section at the end of the paper which provides a list of suggestions to improve the literature review.
There should be a particular team consisting of at least two reviewers minimum so that the process of evaluation of the methodology can be done noticing the quality of the protocol of the selected data sources.
The literature review facilities related to a research paper on any topic or subject field is a definite set of research work-related data factual documents about the conducted survey of different scholarly sources on a variety of specific topics.
The introduction must present an outline of the topic focusing on the objectives of the literature review. The importance of introduction part essentially must provide all the readers with a very high-level and quality enriched roadmap of all the chapters regarding the subject matter so that it can give all the readers a great taste of the journey which lies ahead within the literature review.
The introduction portion states the purpose of the literature review. The introduction section gives a short description of what will be discussed in the literature review, including a layout of how the content will move forward from the start to the end.
The main part must not just define the whole topic but should also review every small detail which includes performing a few tasks like – identification, analysis, evaluation, and finalising what needs to be written. There are three patterns of structuring the main body – chronologically, thematically, and methodologically, where the most commonly utilised pattern is Methodological; consisting of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies.
The main body of the literature review is considered to be the central point of the whole content work revealing the presentation, by analysing the questions of the literature review, evaluating the collected facts and figures of the data, and then synthesising the existing literature research.
Once both the prior sections are finished then comes the last section where the whole content is summarised and shortened sharing all the discussed points and revelations related to the subject matter. The conclusion part gives the readers a feel of an ending or getting an exit from the content. After the conclusion comes another small but essential section that must not be avoided by the writers - the recommendation part.
The recommendation part is a short part where suggestions are given by the writer about how further writings can be improved in a better way, what points might be missing in this review and should not be missed in future reviews, and how the content can be restructured in a better way from the next time.
The three parts of a literature review are an introduction that sets the context of the literature along with outlining the scope. The body comprises the critical analysis and evaluation of relevant literature. Lastly, the conclusion is a summary of all key findings and gaps for future research.
The three levels of literature review are descriptive, analytical, and critical. A descriptive review is a summary of the existing literature without giving an analysis. Analytical reviews are all about examining the literature and identifying gaps and inconsistencies. Critical reviews evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of studies.
A literature review is a critical analysis of existing research. It also provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge. For example, a literature review on the effectiveness related to mindfulness-based interventions in order to reduce stress and evaluate relevant studies.
The process of reviewing literature involves many steps. Firstly, it defines the research question. The second is to search for relevant articles and literature. The third is to evaluate and select the reliable sources. Fourth, analysis of all the findings collected by the students. Fifth, arranging the review in a specific structure.
There are various types of literature reviews including narrative, systematic, meta-analysis, and scoping reviews. Narrative reviews are the ones that provide a broad overview of the literature. Systematic reviews follow a structured process regarding identifying and evaluating relevant studies.
The writing of a research paper-related literature review mainly involves a paradox process concerning the literature study analysis. Apart from this, the students might also perform plagiarism because of their lack of proper writing skills or subject-related knowledge in them.
The main body of the literature review is considered to be the central point of the whole content work revealing the presentation, by analysing the questions of the literature review, evaluating the collected facts and figures of the data, and then synthesising the existing literature research. The conclusion part gives the readers a feel of an ending or getting an exit from the content.
The literature review facilities related to a research paper on any topic or subject field is a definite set of research work-related data factual documents about the conducted survey of different scholarly sources on a variety of specific topics. The conclusion part gives the readers a feel of an ending or getting an exit from the content.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
04 Oct 2024
Your blog post on the three steps of writing a literature review is a game-changer! I've struggled with this aspect of academic writing for a while, but your breakdown of the process and the examples you provided have given me a clearer roadmap to follow. Thank you for sharing such valuable insights!
Fantastic breakdown of the three steps involved in writing a literature review! Your clear explanations and inclusion of examples make it so much easier for readers to grasp the concept. I especially appreciate how you've demystified a potentially overwhelming process. Looking forward to implementing these steps in my own literature review.
This post is a lifesaver! The breakdown of the three steps, along with the examples, has clarified so much for me. I've always found literature reviews a bit challenging, but your post has made me feel more confident about tackling them. The examples really drive home the points, making it easier to apply these steps to my own research.
What an insightful guide! Your examples have added a practical dimension to the theoretical aspects of writing a literature review. The step-by-step breakdown ensures that even someone new to the process can follow along. I'll definitely be referencing this post as I work on my next literature review. Thanks for sharing your expertise!
Your blog has been a tremendous help in clarifying the often perplexing task of writing a literature review. The examples you've provided make the process seem less daunting, and your breakdown of the three steps is incredibly user-friendly. I appreciate the effort you've put into creating such a valuable resource for researchers and students alike.