Reflecting on Faith Experiences

Introduction

Theological reflection is a method for doing religious philosophy that starts from the encounters of life and prompts looking in confidence, for more profound importance, and for the living God (Dean, n.d.). Be that as it may, it is concluding how to live out of this intelligent inquiry that is the basic goal of the procedure of religious reflection. Religious reflection puts the reflector in discussion with different wellsprings of the disclosure of God, fundamentally the confidence convention of the individual or network. The world setting of the experience is additionally especially brilliant of significance and the living God. According to Graham (Ed.) (2013), the confidence custom and other worldliness of the reflector are extra huge sources uncovering the experience of God. Basic discussion among the sources is a procedure by which explanation, contrasts, or bits of knowledge commonly challenge and grow one another. From this extended attention to God's essence in the experience, choices are settled on for progressively significant and prophetic decisions in service. Through this basic discussion the reflector is frequently tested to a reaction of change of heart, psyche, and activity. In this paper, the focus is on the comprehension as the application of models of theological reflection, and an analysis of its context.

Critical Understanding and Use of Models of Theological Reflection

Theological reflection portrays the way toward gaining legitimately from our experience. As a purposeful and methodical movement in the study hall too as through close to home assignments, it endeavors to empower people to find God's quality as far as they can tell, the distinction God's essence makes in their lives, and what God expects subsequently. As a learning intercession in the study hall, Dean (n.d.) attest that it certainly models otherworldly insight for the understudy: restraining oneself to take a gander at involvement in the third eye of confidence; persistently asking the God inquiry; and analyzing qualities and center convictions for their express relationship to philosophy.

Religious reflection, as a purposeful movement in the study hall, is an imaginative and stimulating device for learning. As of now, Graham (Ed.) (2013) identifies that plenty of models of reflection are accessible for instructor use. Table 1 records the developments or steps of a few of these models. Each shifts in its educational multifaceted nature, ease of use, and flexibility relying on the substance objectives and learning results made arrangements for a given course.

A shared factor of these models is that each depicts a working guide of logical religious philosophy. "Logical religious philosophy can be characterized as a method for doing philosophy wherein one considers: the soul and message of the gospel; the convention of the Christian individuals; the way of life where one is theologizing; and social change in that culture (Trokan, 1997). Each model shows an alternate method for theologizing which pays attention to a specific setting, thus each speaks to an unmistakable philosophical beginning stage and presuppositions.

The source of the greater part of these models can be followed to Lonergan's Method in Theology, wherein he tends to the human limit with respect to self-greatness what's more, and the activities that establish endeavors at legitimate insight: visiting, getting, judging, choosing, and cherishing. Changing philosophical training would be purposefully captivating understudies in each of the five of these methods. The methods include; the Lonergan Transcendental method, Browning method of correlation, whitehead and whitehead method of ministry and Delve, Mint and Stewart Service Learning. Other methods of theological reflection include Groome Shared Praxis, Holland and Henroit Pastoral Circle, Shea Narrative Storytelling and Killen and DeBeer Movement towards Insight. This paper will focus on just three models, and they include; Lonergan Transcendental Method, Browning Method of Correlation.

Lonergan Transcendental Method

Lonergan has been credited with the progressive plan of a technique for strategies on exactly controlled, by and by evident examination of cognizant subjectivity. Hestenes (2012) depict that this investigation, beginning from a thought of the subject's purposeful, expounds our cognitional structure, whose exigencies thusly direct the technique for transcendentalism, coordinate the techniques for the common sciences, and give the formal anthropological segment of the techniques for the human sciences and philosophy.

Killen and de Beer (n.d), research on the off chance that Lonergan is a fanatic of theoretical information for its own purpose even to the degree of establishing mysticism on the elements of its accomplishment, he is likewise conscious of the results of its organization. Let us at that point test occurrences from his works in which his thick and specialized discourses quickly respect energetic asides that uncover his crusade against the departure from understanding.

Shaughnessy (1996) argues that the departure from comprehension produces the crippling predispositions of individual braggarts and aggregate between emotional gatherings (groups, clans, classes, political and proficient associations, countries, and so forth.) Most malignant of all is the general predisposition intrinsic in good judgment: «the curious danger...to expand its genuine worry for the solid and the quickly viable into ignore of bigger issues and detachment to long haul results

The hugeness of strategy in capturing social decay is to elucidate the bases on which presence of mind can be made a decision, for in spite of its significant rational soundness with respect to the specific it is completely unequipped for condemning itself (Killen and de Beer, n.d). Just a brain sensitive to strategy can distinguish its very own predisposition when that inclination is upheld by the surface of a whole human advancement:

Suppositions and mentalities that used to be the peculiarity of a minority step by step spread through society to turn into the sayings of lawmakers and writers, the presumptions of administrators and instructors, the unopposed core of the sound judgment of a people.

According to Paver (2016), the degree of culture and financial praxis, it is the presence of mind that must be directed by science.

Science, nonetheless, could no more place a selective case on information than presence of mind could. Presently that the advancement of science itself has cut the umbilical string of possible logical elements of mechanist determinism, and the possible space and time in which they should move, the need to recognize logical positions and their extra-logical trappings is all the more acutely felt:

Rather than trusting that the researchers will realize the disposal of the mixed up thoughtful presumption of mechanist determinism... transcendentalism embraces the change claim Townsen (2002). To the extent that there is operative...a transcendentalism as we are endeavoring to consider it, one has a rule that will change the counter-positions in contemporary science.

Another ramification of transcendental method for the sciences is the likelihood for logical coordinated effort. As the complexities of individual branches of information grow, the propensity to discover increasingly more about fewer and fewer sets in: Self appointment can be upset by all out retention in the article, as in the specific sciences argues Hestenes (2012) in a research on theology studies. The scourge of confined sciences also, shortage of interdisciplinary specialists is outstanding; Lonergan makes a determination with respect to technique:

It is in the measure that exceptional strategies recognize their regular center in supernatural strategy, that standards normal to every one of the sciences will be recognized, that a secure premise will be achieved for assaulting interdisciplinary issues, and that the sciences will be activated inside a higher unity...in which they will have the option to make their...contribution to the arrangement of key issues (Townsen, 2002).

Going to theory appropriate, the noteworthiness of transcendental method can maybe best be thrown with regards to the chronicled rationalization of the interest for strategy in transcendentalism.

This interest emerged from the obviously insoluble issue of recognizing divine effortlessness and human opportunity given the inconceivability of considering one term without the other (Paver, 2016). The specialized qualification (most totally defined by Aquinas) of reason and confidence in two estimative requests, one characteristic and the other supervening unnecessarily, has withstood a blast steady assaults all through seven centuries. It has just developed in significance inside Catholic religious philosophy.

In spite of the fact that this medieval accomplishment is a differentiation inside religious philosophy, its essentialness broadens further:

...when reason is recognized to be unmistakable from confidence, there is given a challenge to motivation to develop in cognizance of its local force, to guarantee its legitimate field of request, to work out its divisions of examination, to decide its very own techniques, to work based on its claim standards and statutes claims Roberts (Ed.) (2016).

Browning Method of Correlation

Park (2006) figures out in a book written by Don Browning, he has explained the approach of correlation of theology reflection, or the manner in which these religious communities make sense to people. It is a seminar work unto which he researches on how individuals seek to comprehend the manner, in which religious communities exhibit practical reason, and his work offers two ideas; Browning is targeting people who are pursuing the comprehension of religious groups and the kind of wisdom they embody. Secondly, he is interested in religious groups’ more than individualistic theology. He presumes that communities do theology and evince wisdom, and he tries to figure out how that functions.

According to Paver (2016), Browning presumes that churches or congregations are communities of memory and practical reason. That is; they have a history, tradition and normative texts that offer insight on their beliefs, practices and values. As a practical reason, the communities, that is, churches and congregations engage in ever-adjusting context in the pursuit to remain faithful to the God and significant to the world.

In this field of theological reflection, has been for a long time now been despised by other theological disciplines. The field of study of theology itself possessed few allies, even in congregations. To accent in collegiate circles that one is a theologian has been, in near years, to entreat humiliation researches Park (2006). To claim that one is a theologian calls for even more grave doubt. To confess in a significant tertiary institution that one is a practical theologian has also been to court embarrassment. With the resurrection of realistic philosophies, practical theology itself was resurrected.

According to Kim (2007), the reemergence of realistic philosophies, there has emerged a contemporary enchantment with terms such as realistic reason, realistic wisdom, praxis, dialogue, consensus, practice, phronesis, justice, communication and conversation. The appeal suggests that Western civilizations are desperate for figure paths to create shared and feasible decisions concerning the common good as well as the trivial life.

At long last, these constituents fit together as parts and procedures inside what Browning calls an internal center and external envelope. The inward center comprises of the solid exercises of day by day life for people and networks. It is inside the course of day by day living that an emergency happens, moving us into the external envelope. In the external envelope, we locate the story structure and thick social portrayals that house and approve the inward center. It is in the communication with this external envelope that we fundamentally connect, and utilize phronesis argues Kim (2007). The entirety of the sub-classes of the philosophical order are available in the external envelope, and make up what Browning calls a Fundamental Practical Theology. All things considered, each sub-development in the external envelope worried about praxis.

According to Whitehead and Whitehead (1995), there are four sub-developments in the external envelope: profound portrayal that starts the investigation with a depiction of what and why of our conduct. It is a profound depiction since it connects with the wellsprings of our story inserted inside our praxis that structure our perspective about what is done according to Kelly (2013). Recorded philosophy draws in the scriptural and verifiable religious substance of our praxis to approve or negate it as per the doctrinal sources our locale esteems. Deliberate philosophy acquires us to the correlational methodology which the praxis we examined in portrayal, and the praxis recommended inside recorded religious philosophy are united to propose another researches Roberts (Ed.) (2016). The development is basic correlational as it unites movement and messages, and tries to propel purposes behind another praxis. At long last key useful religious philosophy is the fourth move that brings the previous three moves together to respond to the inquiries "what should we do" and "in what capacity will we live?" It is a key development that builds up the standards and methodologies of solid practices considering investigations of solid circumstances.

The two approaches of transcendent method and Browning Method of correlation in theological reflection not just considers the transmission of philosophical information, however models a basic hypothesis of knowing and welcomes understudies to learn a control which can fill in as a lifetime apparatus for continuous change.

One strategy is the creation of new information and the second is the one in which you know the current information. What happens for the most part is that we dichotomize these two minutes; we make them isolated.

Information is created in a spot a long way from the understudies, who are asked to just retain what the educator says. Thusly, there is diminishing of the craft of knowing into an unimportant transference of existing information.

Conclusion

Theological reflection is a manner in which theology is pursued from the experiences of life and leads to searching of faith, for fathomless meaning and search for a higher being; God. However, it is all about deciding on how to live one’s life out of this reflective study that is the critical intention of the application of methods like Lonergan Transcendental The second method of theological reflection is the Browning Method of correlation and has focused its attention on interpreting common human experiences, the religious symbols, and correlation of the two interpretations. In addition the method metaphysically analyzes the use of both cultural and societal inquiry in the light of theological vision and finally the actions and programs involved in the quest for individual experience and realistic practices. Both models hypothesize knowledge and welcomes under-researches to learn to control which can fill in as a lifetime apparatus for continuous adjustment.

References

Dean, A. Theological Reflection: Is It for Me. Journal of Religious Education, 50, 29-37.

Graham, E. (Ed.). (2013). Theological reflection: sources. scm Press.

Hestenes, M. (2012). The early Browning: Pastoral care in a pluralistic age and the method of practical moral inquiry. HTS Theological Studies, 68(2), 91-98.

Kelly, E. (2013). Translating theological reflective practice into values based reflection: A report from Scotland. Reflective practice: Formation and supervision in ministry, 1.

Killen, P. O. C., & de Beer, J. The Art of Theological Reflection (New York: Crossroad, 1994), viii. 23. Schneiders,“The discipline of Christian spirituality and Catholic theology, 198.

Kim, H. S. (2007). The hermeneutical-praxis paradigm and practical theology. Religious education, 102(4), 419-436.

Park, S. (2006). An evolving history and methodology of pastoral theology, care, and counseling. Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health, 9(1), 5-33.

Paver, J. E. (2016). Theological reflection and education for ministry: the search for integration in theology. Routledge.

Roberts, M. V. (Ed.). (2016). Comparing faithfully: Insights for systematic theological reflection (Vol. 1). Fordham Univ Press.

Shaughnessy, W. G. (1996). The subject in the transcendental method of Bernard Lonergan.

TOWNSEN, L. (2002). Theological reflection, pastoral counseling and supervision. Journal of Pastoral Theology, 12(1), 63-74.

Trokan, J. (1997). Models of theological reflection: Theory and praxis. Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 1(2).

Whitehead, J. D., & Whitehead, E. E. (1995). Method in ministry: Theological reflection and Christian ministry. Rowman & Littlefield.