Exploring Complementary Therapies

Introduction

Contemporary therapies are referred to as alternative medicines which are used together with conventional medicine in the belief that it would help to create better health condition. The complementary therapies are important because they focus on helping the patients with side effects of any treatments. Moreover, the therapies are effective to offer relaxing and soothing effect on the minds of the individuals who are suffering from long-term health condition to make them feel emotionally stable and less depressed. In this assignment, the principles related to complementary therapies are to be explained. The roles of complementary therapies which are related to orthodox medicine are to be discussed. The efficacy of the complementary therapies is to be analysed and the regulation related to complementary therapies are to be discussed. Additionally, those seeking healthcare dissertation help can benefit from understanding the efficacy of complementary therapies and the regulations associated with them.

Task 1

1.1 Explaining treatment processes for the complementary therapies which are widely accepted

The complementary therapies mainly include mind-body therapies in which the power of the body spirit and mind is targeted to be harnessed for healing the body. The therapies also consist of massages as well as physical manipulation executed by practitioner for promoting healing of the body (Lindquist et al. 2018). The different nature of contemporary therapies is acupuncture, aromatherapy, yoga, chiropractic and others (Brami et al. 2016). The acupuncture is the therapy which is used for the treatment of common illness such as headache, arthritis, chronic fatigue symptoms and others. In this therapy, needles which are very fine are inserted at specific points in the skin which are considered as lines of energy (Bergdahl et al. 2017). In aromatherapy, natural extracts which are retrieved from plants are used for healing people. In this process, the natural aromatic extracts, as well as essential oils from fruits, barks, roots and other parts of the plants, are refined. The essential oils are often applied to the body of the patients where they are going to take the smell of the oils through their senses to feel relaxed and healed (Ali et al. 2015). In chiropractic therapy, the practitioners place the patient in a specific position and use their bare hands to apply a sudden and controlled force to a joint so that it can be pushed beyond its normal range. This therapy is done to treat misalignment of joints mainly in the spinal column (Valle et al. 2016). Reflexology is referred to the therapy in which massage is provided to different reflex points in the body for stimulating blood circulation. This therapy is effective to relive tension and influence the body’s vital energy to make the person feel relaxed (Holmstrom et al. 2016).

1.2 Assessing the benefits and limitations of complementary therapies

The advantage of complementary therapies is that it provides holistic healing opportunity for the patients by providing them with the ability to get back the balance of their mind and body which is disturbed as a result of pain brought through illness. The therapies help the patients to identify the root cause of their illness and the way the root cause is to be healed other than just the symptoms (Armstrong et al. 2019). However, the disadvantage of complementary therapies is that they take increased amount of time to health the patient which makes individuals suffer loner time from the illness before actually getting healed (Stub et al. 2018). In contrast, the advantage of complementary therapy is that it is less costly compared to orthodox medicine and treatment. This is because complementary therapies use natural medicines and ways of treatment which are less complex and easy to be provided (Armstrong et al. 2019). However, the disadvantage of complementary therapy is that it may cause unnecessary harm to the body and they are not seen to be scientifically approved to be used for healing people from illness or diseases (Jaiswal et al. 2015). In contrast, the advantage of complementary therapies is that it can be used as supportive treatment to physically and emotionally control the patients so that they show proper participation to use orthodox medicine apart from the therapies to ensure improved well-being (Yazdkhasti and Pirak, 2016).

1.3 Analysing the factors which influence access to complementary theories nationally and locally

The factors which are influencing access to complementary therapies locally include improved physical access, referral system and cost-effectiveness. The NHS in the UK is seen to be arranging complementary therapies free of cost in many hospitals as well as wards for patients suffering from cancer, arthritis and other diseases (NHS, 2019). Thus, having well-informed about the therapies as well as their physical presence is leading more patients present in local areas to try to avail them for healing and well-being. In the UK, it is seen that some of the general practitioners are referring patients to avail complementary therapies because they feel that it offers better choice to the people to get healed of pain and show response to have improved health condition (wellspringhlc.org.uk, 2016). This, rising referral system are influencing use of complementary therapies in the UK locally. The cultural factors mainly influence use of complementary therapies nationally. This is evident as use of acupuncture is seen to be clinically preferred among the Chinese population nationally. In addition, use of yoga and homeopathy as complementary therapies are seen to be commonly preferred by people of South Asian origin (Alter, 2018).

Task 2

2.1 Analysing the role of complementary therapies in relation to orthodox treatment

The role of the complementary therapies as provided by Revitalise Complementary Therapy Centre in muculoskeletal disorder is to act as analgesic so that they can resolve the pain in the joints and muscles to make the patient feel relaxed. The therapies also act as anti-inflammatory medications as well as acts to improve the strength of the bones as well as muscles so that hindrance to move due to inflammation can be resolved (Lorenc et al. 2018). In contrast, the role of orthodox treatment in muculoskeletal disorder is that it acts to improve the density of the muscles and bone which have worn out due to friction between joints so that the person have the ability to regain proper ability to move (Zhang et al. 2016). It is evident as in testosterone therapy which is a nature of orthodox treatment leads men to retain the bone density to ensure proper mobility even after 65 years of age or older (Williams, 2017). The role of complementary therapies as provided by Revitalise Complementary Therapy Centre on cardiovascular disorder is that they act to improve and strengthen the muscles of the heart so that they are coordinated to work properly in resolving the illness (Bervoets et al. 2015). The role of orthodox therapy in cardiovascular disorder is to control the normal heart rate and proper functioning of the heart through use of surgery and medication (Williams, 2017).

The role of orthodox medicine in metabolic disorder such as digestive process, endocrine function, immunity, reproduction and others is to resolve the symptoms related to the diseases. This is evident as for individuals suffering from digestive problem are provided medication which helps to normalise the acidic in the stomach to resolve the symptoms related to the disorder (Calin et al. 2017). In reproductive and endocrine disorder, the orthodox treatment is used for promoting or exaggerating the normal release of hormones and endocrine functioning of the glands to resolve disorder and illness (Studd et al. 2019). The role of complementary therapy in metabolic disorder is that they act to stretch as well as tome muscles along with stimulate the endocrine glands so that they work effectively to resolve the illness being faced (Le Barz et al. 2015).

2.2 Evaluating attitude towards complementary therapies

There are different groups of people who have different attitude towards accepting and using complementary therapies for treatment purpose. The general practitioners and expert health professionals have the attitude that there is lack of presence of scientific proof and clinical evidence for complementary therapies to be functional and effective in fruitfully resolving health complications of the patients (Bailey et al. 2017). This is evident as health professional perceives that complementary therapies such as acupuncture in which needle is inserted in the body are able to create infection as well as damage internal nerve or body organs making the person to experience further deteriorated health condition (Rong et al. 2016). In addition, using yoga as complementary therapy as per attitude of the doctors may lead the individual to try achieving such a posture which may damage the muscles and joints leading the patient to experience pain instead of getting relived of illness (Keosaian et al. 2016). In contrast, the patients suffering from any illness often show positive attitude towards accepting complementary therapies for their well-being. This is because they consider the therapies to be cost-effective, natural healers, lacks side-effects, culturally approved and others (King et al. 2015). However, the nurses and family members show even attitude regarding complementary therapies where they mention that the therapies are to be offered to patients accompanied by orthodox treatment to ensure more effective health improvement instead of using only orthodox medicine for healing (Krug et al. 2016). This is because they feel contemporary therapies heals pain and provide relaxation to patients to make them emotionally and physically stable to accept orthodox treatment properly.

2.3 Assessing the psychological impact of complementary therapies

The complementary therapies are found to deliver better psychological impact on the health of the patients. As asserted by Hussain et al. (2017), people suffering from complex and long-term health disorder are often found to develop stress and depression. This is because the people are agitated with the underperformance of their health and continuous availing of healthcare and medications which in some cases inflict pain and side-effects on their body to finally offer them better health condition. This is evident as patients suffering from cancer on receiving chemotherapy reports of pain and side-effects on their body which makes them agitated and depressed with their condition (Farooqui et al. 2016). The complementary therapies are seen to act in resolving and reducing the pain experienced by the individuals due to their long-term health condition, in turn, trying to make the patients feel relaxed (Gaiswinkler and Unterrainer, 2016). Thus, the therapies provided by Revitalise Complementary Therapy Centre impacts on patients to calm their emotions and improve their general sense of health as well as well-being. As mentioned by Bhayankaram et al. (2018), complementary therapy such as hypnotherapy has psychological impact to reduce anxiety and stress by normalising increased heart rate and blood pressure. This is because in hypnotherapy such as provided by Revitalise Complementary Therapy Centre it is seen that the process helps the thoughts of the patient to be manipulated in such a way so that it modulates the stress response system in the body which leads it to calm the body. As argued by Vieira et al. (2018), complementary therapy such as acupuncture acts on the pressure points of the body to reduce the feeling of pain, improving movement, resolving numbness in hands and others to provides a clamming effect on the body. This leads the therapy to have psychological impact to reduce panic disorder systems, anxiety and stress among the patients.

2.4 Comparing the contra-indicators between complementary and orthodox changes

The contra-indicators are referred to as the factors that are considered as a reason for withholding a particular medical treatment because of the idea of harm it can cause to others. As asserted by Johnson et al. (2018), the contra-indicators between orthodox treatment and complementary therapies is that orthodox treatments are considered by health practitioners to be more focussed on determining and resolving the inner health issues which are leading to cause the illness. This leads the orthodox treatment to provide an easy and immediate cure or early intervention in resolving the health complication. As argued by Kessler et al. (2018), complementary therapies are doubted by health practitioners over orthodox treatment as they are not effects to provide safe care to the patients. This is because needles used in acupuncture as seen in Revitalise Complementary Therapy Centre may lead individuals to get infected due to lack of sterilisation and aromatic oils along with herbal medicines used may lead to irritate the eyes, lungs and throat of individuals making them suffer. As commented by Mustian et al. (2017), contra-indicators with orthodox treatment and complementary therapies is that complementary therapies may be risky for the patients to be received compared to orthodox treatment. This is because complementary therapies such as the Alexander Technique and others provided by Revitalise Complementary Therapy Centre do not have any scientific basis or effective rules of providing them as seen in the case of orthodox treatments.

Task 3: Information Booklet

3.1 Analysing the reliability and validity of information source on complementary therapies

The reliability and validity of information sources on complementary therapies are important so that authenticated sources can be used for availing care by the people. As commented by Sharpe et al. (2016), sources of complementary therapies are determined to be reliable and valid if it shows positive and assured history of commercial success. This is because commercial success of any source of healthcare is seen when it has been effective to provide wide range of assured health improvements for patients. As argued by Ladas et al. (2015), unable to provide successful care as promised to patients leads the source of healthcare to develop negative image in the market. This indicates that sources of information for complementary therapies would be regarded as unreliable when they show history to lack of success in providing assured care to the patients. As mentioned by van der Werf et al. (2018), sources of complementary therapies would be regarded as reliable and valid if they are approved by the government along with registered health professional. This is because the government and registered health professional after proper assessment and assurance through clinical evaluation refers any source of complementary therapies to the patients to ensure they are able to receive proper care.

3.2 Evaluating evidence that claims benefits of complementary therapies

The study of Zhu et al. (2018) claims that Bell ’s palsy among patients can be resolved by using acupuncture as complementary therapy. The Bell's palsy is referred to the disorder in which the facial nerve is damaged leading the individual to become weak or paralyzed to use muscles of the face (Eviston et al. 2015). The study mentioned that use of acupuncture on the pressure points of the individuals to improve blood circulation to the face and nourishing the tendons and muscles leads to help them get naturally healed and develop normal functioning of their facial muscles. In the research of Bakhtshirin et al. (2015), it is asserted that the use of aromatherapy is effective in lower primary dysmenorrhea (painful menstruation). This is evident as the use of lavender oil massage leads to lower the pain sensitivity among the individuals making them feel relaxed. In the study of Zhu et al. (2018), it is mentioned that acupuncture is used for the treatment of shoulder dislocation instead of open surgery. The study reveals that a 20-year-old girl who has previously received shoulder arthroscopy showed dislocation of the shoulder joint and a broken piece of bone after 2 years. In this condition, 10 sessions of acupuncture was provided and MRI report later showed that the shoulder is normally working. Thus, the study mentions that complementary therapy is effective in resolving shoulder dislocation.

3.3 Recommending use of complementary therapy within a specific group based on the collected evidence

The evidence gathered regarding complementary therapies leads to develop the recommendation that acupuncture can be used to health nerve complications and dislocation of bones among patients without making them opt for orthodox treatment such as open surgery. This is because open surgery is found to be complicated and require increased amount of finances compared to complementary therapy such as acupuncture. Moreover, in open surgery, there is risk for the patients to lose blood whereas in acupuncture no such chances are present as no incision is made on the body (Rothman et al. 2016). The aromatherapy is recommended to be used for patients to help them ease with any pain. This is because the collected evidence mentions that aromatherapy is effective to soothe the muscles of the body to work effectively for helping the body to be relieved of pain (Shin et al. 2016).

Task 4

4.1 Evaluating the effectiveness of present system for using complementary therapies

In the UK, at the present there are no proper legal systems developed to approve the use of complementary therapies. However, it is been mentioned by the NHS that therapist who are providing acupuncture as complementary therapy required to be registered with the British Acupuncture Council (BAC) and have to hold a licence approved by the council to work and execute practices in the county (acupuncture.org.uk, 2019). This policy by BAC is effective for using complementary therapy such as acupuncture as it provides licence and approval to individuals for practicing therapies only after proper evaluation of knowledge and efficiency of the practitioners regarding the delivery of the therapy. The NHS mentions that complementary therapies are to be used by patients’ not as sole treatment process but as additional treatment with orthodox medicine to ensure their proper well-being (NHS, 2019). This current approval from the NHS would lead to improve the health of the patients by resolving risk to be faced on solely using complementary therapies are healing purpose for illness.

4.2 Recommending for improvement of regulatory system while using complementary therapies

The regulatory system regarding complementary therapies is required to be improved so that improved healthcare intervention and well-being of the patients can be achieved. As asserted by Almeida (2016), proper legalisation of complementary therapies would lead the services to be provided to patients in a concerned and valued manner so that risk for them is reduced. This is because presence of legal actions would make the practitioner remain aware that they have to execute care properly or they would be charged guilty as well as may be fined and sent to prison leading them unable to execute their profession any further. Moreover, it is recommended that complementary therapies are to be assessed and monitored under legal system so that it professional implementation can be expanded. This is because legal approval would lead health practitioners to approve complementary therapies which are lower in cost compared to orthodox medicine to be used by the poor patients for improved health.

Conclusion

The above discussion informs that in complementary therapy such as acupuncture needles are inserted in pressure points and it is done to help the patients get relieved of pain. The benefit of complementary therapy is that it is easily available, cost-effective, lack side-effects and others whereas its disadvantages are that it is not scientifically approved and lack evidence for use. The contra-indicators between orthodox treatment and complementary therapies is that complementary therapies may in some cases cause infection, unnecessary nerve damage and others which are not usually caused through orthodox treatment. There are still no effectively approved legal systems for use of complementary therapies in the UK but the NHS approves it to be used along with orthodox medicine to ensure better well-being.

References

Ali, B., Al-Wabel, N.A., Shams, S., Ahamad, A., Khan, S.A. and Anwar, F., 2015. Essential oils used in aromatherapy: A systemic review. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, 5(8), pp.601-611.

Almeida, J., 2016. Complementary and alternative medicine’s occupational closure in Portuguese healthcare: Contradictions and challenges. Health:, 20(5), pp.447-464.

Alter, J.S., 2018. Yoga, Nature Cure and “Perfect” Health: The Purity of the Fluid Body in an Impure World. Yoga in Transformation: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, 16, p.439.

Armstrong, M., Flemming, K., Kupeli, N., Stone, P., Wilkinson, S. and Candy, B., 2019. Aromatherapy, massage and reflexology: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of the perspectives from people with palliative care needs. Palliative medicine, p.0269216319846440.

Bailey, A., Wingard, D., Allison, M., Summers, P. and Calac, D., 2017. Acupuncture treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in an American Indian community. Journal of acupuncture and meridian studies, 10(2), pp.90-95.

Bakhtshirin, F., Abedi, S., YusefiZoj, P. and Razmjooee, D., 2015. The effect of aromatherapy massage with lavender oil on severity of primary dysmenorrhea in Arsanjan students. Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research, 20(1), p.156.

Bergdahl, L., Broman, J.E., Berman, A.H., Haglund, K., von Knorring, L. and Markström, A., 2017. Sleep patterns in a randomized controlled trial of auricular acupuncture and cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia. Complementary therapies in clinical practice, 28, pp.220-226.

Bervoets, D.C., Luijsterburg, P.A., Alessie, J.J., Buijs, M.J. and Verhagen, A.P., 2015. Massage therapy has short-term benefits for people with common musculoskeletal disorders compared to no treatment: a systematic review. Journal of physiotherapy, 61(3), pp.106-116.

Bhayankaram, N.P., Gilchrist, F.J. and Samuels, M., 2018. Is hypnotherapy an acceptable treatment option for children with habit cough?. Complementary therapies in medicine, 37, pp.27-28.

Brami, C., Bao, T. and Deng, G., 2016. Natural products and complementary therapies for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review. Critical reviews in oncology/hematology, 98, pp.325-334.

Calin, A.M., Debita, M., Dragomir, R., Stefanescu, O.M., Budacu, C. and Szalontay, A.S., 2017. Treatement methods conditioned by the gravity of drug-induced gingival hyperplasias. Rev. Chim.(Bucharest), 68, pp.2618-2622.

Eviston, T.J., Croxson, G.R., Kennedy, P.G., Hadlock, T. and Krishnan, A.V., 2015. Bell's palsy: aetiology, clinical features and multidisciplinary care. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 86(12), pp.1356-1361.

Farooqui, M., Hassali, M.A., Shatar, A.K.A., Farooqui, M.A., Saleem, F., ul Haq, N. and Othman, C.N., 2016. Use of complementary and alternative medicines among Malaysian cancer patients: A descriptive study. Journal of traditional and complementary medicine, 6(4), pp.321-326.

Gaiswinkler, L. and Unterrainer, H.F., 2016. The relationship between yoga involvement, mindfulness and psychological well-being. Complementary therapies in medicine, 26, pp.123-127.

Holmstrom, A.J., Wyatt, G.K., Sikorskii, A., Musatics, C., Stolz, E. and Havener, N., 2016. Dyadic recruitment in complementary therapy studies: experience from a clinical trial of caregiver-delivered reflexology. Applied Nursing Research, 29, pp.136-139.

Hussain, S.T., Mostaghimi, A., Barr, P.J., Brown, J.R., Joyce, C. and Huang, K.P., 2017. Utilization of mental health resources and complementary and alternative therapies for alopecia areata: A US survey. International journal of trichology, 9(4), p.160.

Jaiswal, K., Bajait, C., Pimpalkhute, S., Sontakke, S., Dakhale, G. and Magdum, A., 2015. Knowledge, attitude and practice of complementary and alternative medicine: A patient’s perspective. International Journal of Medicine and Public Health, 5(1). pp.-28-39.

Johnson, S.B., Park, H.S., Gross, C.P. and James, B.Y., 2018. Complementary medicine, refusal of conventional cancer therapy, and survival among patients with curable cancers. JAMA oncology, 4(10), pp.1375-1381.

Keosaian, J.E., Lemaster, C.M., Dresner, D., Godersky, M.E., Paris, R., Sherman, K.J. and Saper, R.B., 2016. “We’re all in this together”: a qualitative study of predominantly low income minority participants in a yoga trial for chronic low back pain. Complementary therapies in medicine, 24, pp.34-39.

Kessler, C.S., Dhiman, K.S., Kumar, A., Ostermann, T., Gupta, S., Morandi, A., Mittwede, M., Stapelfeldt, E., Spoo, M., Icke, K. and Michalsen, A., 2018. Effectiveness of an Ayurveda treatment approach in knee osteoarthritis–a randomized controlled trial. Osteoarthritis and cartilage, 26(5), pp.620-630.

King, N., Balneaves, L.G., Levin, G.T., Nguyen, T., Nation, J.G., Card, C., Truant, T. and Carlson, L.E., 2015. Surveys of cancer patients and cancer health care providers regarding complementary therapy use, communication, and information needs. Integrative cancer therapies, 14(6), pp.515-524.

Krug, K., Kraus, K.I., Herrmann, K. and Joos, S., 2016. Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) as part of primary health care in Germany–comparison of patients consulting general practitioners and CAM practitioners: a cross-sectional study. BMC complementary and alternative medicine, 16(1), p.409.

Ladas, E.J., Lin, M., Antillion, F., Rivas, S., Chantada, G., Cacciavillano, W., Ortiz, R., Stein, K., Castillo, L., Rocha, V. and Fu, L., 2015. Improving our understanding of the use of traditional complementary/alternative medicine in children with cancer. Cancer, 121(9), pp.1492-1498.

Le Barz, M., Anhê, F.F., Varin, T.V., Desjardins, Y., Levy, E., Roy, D., Urdaci, M.C. and Marette, A., 2015. Probiotics as complementary treatment for metabolic disorders. Diabetes & metabolism journal, 39(4), pp.291-303.

Lindquist, R., Tracy, M.F. and Snyder, M. eds., 2018. Complementary & alternative therapies in nursing. Springer Publishing Company.

Lorenc, A., Feder, G., MacPherson, H., Little, P., Mercer, S.W. and Sharp, D., 2018. Scoping review of systematic reviews of complementary medicine for musculoskeletal and mental health conditions. BMJ open, 8(10), p.e020222.

Mustian, K.M., Alfano, C.M., Heckler, C., Kleckner, A.S., Kleckner, I.R., Leach, C.R., Mohr, D., Palesh, O.G., Peppone, L.J., Piper, B.F. and Scarpato, J., 2017. Comparison of pharmaceutical, psychological, and exercise treatments for cancer-related fatigue: a meta-analysis. JAMA oncology, 3(7), pp.961-968.

Rong, P.J., Zhao, J.J., Wang, L. and Zhou, L.Q., 2016. Analysis of advantages and disadvantages of the location methods of international auricular acupuncture points. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2016.

Rothman, J.P., Burcharth, J., Pommergaard, H.C., Viereck, S. and Rosenberg, J., 2016. Preoperative risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery-a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Digestive surgery, 33(5), pp.414-423.

Sharpe, P.A., Wilcox, S., Schoffman, D.E., Hutto, B. and Ortaglia, A., 2016. Association of complementary and alternative medicine use with symptoms and physical functional performance among adults with arthritis. Disability and health journal, 9(1), pp.37-45.

Shin, E.S., Seo, K.H., Lee, S.H., Jang, J.E., Jung, Y.M., Kim, M.J. and Yeon, J.Y., 2016. Massage with or without aromatherapy for symptom relief in people with cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (6). pp.78-88,

Stub, T., Quandt, S.A., Arcury, T.A., Sandberg, J.C. and Kristoffersen, A.E., 2018. Attitudes and knowledge about direct and indirect risks among conventional and complementary health care providers in cancer care. BMC complementary and alternative medicine, 18(1), p.44.

Studd, J.W., Savvas, M. and Watson, N., 2019. Reproductive Depression and the Response to Hormone Therapy. In Sex Steroids' Effects on Brain, Heart and Vessels (pp. 125-133). Springer, Cham.

Valle, K.L.D., Davidson, Z.E., Kennedy, R.A., Ryan, M.M. and Carroll, K.M., 2016. Physical activity and the use of standard and complementary therapies in Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophies. Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine, 9(1), pp.55-63.

van der Werf, E.T., Duncan, L.J., von Flotow, P. and Baars, E.W., 2018. Do NHS GP surgeries employing GPs additionally trained in integrative or complementary medicine have lower antibiotic prescribing rates? Retrospective cross-sectional analysis of national primary care prescribing data in England in 2016. BMJ open, 8(3), p.e020488.

Vieira, A., Hinzmann, M., Silva, K., Santos, M.J. and Machado, J., 2018. Clinical effect of auricular acupuncture in anxiety levels of students prior to the exams: A randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Integrative Medicine, 20, pp.188-192.

Williams, R.A., 2017. Testosterone treatment in older men still controversial after new findings. Pharmacy Today, 23(5), pp.28-29.

Yazdkhasti, M. and Pirak, A., 2016. The effect of aromatherapy with lavender essence on severity of labor pain and duration of labor in primiparous women. Complementary therapies in clinical practice, 25, pp.81-86.

Zhang, J.Y., Fabricant, P.D., Ishmael, C.R., Wang, J.C., Petrigliano, F.A. and Jones, K.J., 2016. Utilization of platelet-rich plasma for musculoskeletal injuries: an analysis of current treatment trends in the United States. Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 4(12), p.2325967116676241.

Zhu, J., Arsovska, B. and Kozovska, K., 2018. Acupuncture treatment in Bell’s palsy. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS), 17(1), pp.47-49.

Zhu, J., Arsovska, B. and Kozovska, K., 2018. Acupuncture Treatment after Shoulder Arthroscopy after Recurrent Dislocations. Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences, 6(11), p.2133.