Experiences of Good Nursing Practice in Psychiatric Inpatient

Introduction

The critical appraisal framework mentioned by Ryan et al. (2007) initially mentioned appraising the believability of the research. According to Ryan et al. (2007), the believability of the study is ensured when the writing style is error-free in presenting information, authors are adequately qualified, the research topic is clearly mentioned, and the abstract has been provided in an enhanced format. In the study by Gabrielsson et al.(2016), the writing style is found to be concise and free of grammatical error with the academic presentation of information without using unnecessary or unexplained jargon. If you are seeking literature review dissertation help, these aspects are very critical for establishing the credibility of your research. The authors in the study by Gabrielsson et al.(2016) are found to be Ph.D holders in nursing field and acting as lecturers in the Department of Health Sciences in the reputed Luleå University of Technology indicating each of them are adequately qualified in presenting quality and error-free data in the study.

Abstract

The report title is mentioned clearly that is “Taking personal responsibility: Nurses’ and assistant nurses’ experiences of good nursing practice in psychiatric inpatient care” and a detailed abstract is provided which adequately summarises the entire content of the study. The presence of well-developed abstract in research is essential as it assists to present key points from the study to be analysed by the reader to determine the usability of the source for the topic of their concern which assists in saving wastage of time and resources (Ingham-Broomfield, 2017). Since all the elements influencing the believability of the study is positively present in the study by Gabrielsson et al.(2016), thus the study can be considered as credible in exploring topic of good nursing care in psychiatric healthcare settings. Ryan et al. (2007) mention that elements that influence robustness of the study are purpose, literature review, sampling methods, ethics, data collection, finding, conclusion and rigour. The robustness of the study by Gabrielsson et al.(2016) is required to be explored to determine its effectiveness in explaining the study topic.

Study Aim and Purpose

The critical appraisal framework by Ryan et al.(2007) mentions examining if the phenomenon of the study is clearly mentioned and research questions are presented consistently. This is because proper research phenomenon and research question inform the queries to be explored in relation to the study (Sickder et al., 2017). In the study by Gabrielsson et al.(2016), the phenomenon of the study is clearly identified. It is evident as it mentions that the therapeutic relationship of the nurse and patients are important for good nursing practice. According to Ryan et al. (2007) framework, the purpose of the study is to be assessed to determine if it is clearly mentioned. This is because clarified presence of purpose in the study explains the aim with which the study is been developed (Ryan and Niemiec, 2009). The study by Gabrielsson et al.(2016) mentioned its purpose is to explore the experiences of good nursing practice from the nurses and nursing associates regarding psychiatric inpatient care. The presence of a well-developed aim in research helps in presenting the direction and focus of the study to the readers (Loureiro et al., 2019). According to Ryan et al. (2007), in critical appraisal of any article the presence of a well-developed literature review that fulfils the objective of the study is to be evaluated. This is because a well-develop literature review in the article presents the previous information regarding the study topic and mention the gaps present which are tried to be fulfilled in the research (Nibbelink and Brewer, 2018). In the study by Gabrielsson et al.(2016), a well-developed literature review that underpins the philosophical and existing information of the topic is present. Moreover, the review fulfils the objectives of the study by indicating the need of the current study.

Theoretical framework

The critical appraisal framework by Ryan et al. (2007) mentioned determining if any conceptual or theoretical framework has been identified in the study and if the framework is adequate as well as adequately described. This is because enhanced theoretical framework assists in connecting the researcher to existing information (Murray et al., 2019). In the study by Gabrielsson et al.(2016), no conceptual or theoretical framework are mentioned. The theoretical or conceptual framework in research is important to allow the researcher effective mention the need and relevance of the study in the field of their concern (Kitson, 2018). Thus, the lack of the framework in Gabrielsson et al.(2016) fails the researchers to have enhanced support required for explaining relevance of the study in the field of nursing. It is evident as there is a lack of in-depth idea presentation regarding the relevance of the current research in nursing practice. Ryan et al. (2007) mentioned that philosophical approach or method used in executing the study is to be evaluated for its critical appraisal. This is because it explains the way the research is progressed by the researcher in gathering vital data for the study.

Methods, Results and Discussion

In the study by Gabrielsson et al.(2016) general qualitative research design as the philosophical structure is followed which is important as it assist to gather data required for the study which is experiences, context and phenomenon of the study.

The study by Gabrielsson et al.(2016) used purposive sampling method for recruiting participants which is appropriate as the study is qualitative in nature and it is the most suitable sampling method to be used in qualitative studies in recruiting participants.

The sample size included 12 skilled nurses and associate nurses who are relationship-oriented towards the inpatients in psychiatric care environment. The ethics in the study is effectively followed as ethical approval was received from the regional ethics committee in Umea which ensures enhanced moral actions are followed in executing the study.

The results of the study Gabrielsson et al.(2016) mentions that in psychiatric care, the nursing assistant experience good nursing practice when shared values and effective nursing leadership is present. This is because it helps in morally treating the patients, connecting with the patients, use effective time in caring for them with confidence, diversity in care could be achieved and others. The uptake of personal responsibility is part of good practice in nursing and effective prioritisation of patients and gaining support is key in nursing practice.

References

Gabrielsson, S., Sävenstedt, S. and Olsson, M., 2016. Taking personal responsibility: Nurses' and assistant nurses' experiences of good nursing practice in psychiatric inpatient care. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 25(5), pp.434-443.

Ingham-Broomfield, R., 2017. A nurses' guide to ethical considerations and the process for ethical approval of nursing research. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, The, 35(1), pp.40-47.

Kitson, A.L., 2018. The fundamentals of care framework as a point-of-care nursing theory. Nursing Research, 67(2), pp.99-107.

Nibbelink, C.W. and Brewer, B.B., 2018. Decision‐making in nursing practice: An integrative literature review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(5-6), pp.917-928.

Ryan, F., Coughlan, M. and Cronin, P., 2007. Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 2: Qualitative research. British journal of nursing, 16(12), pp.738-744.

Ryan, R.M. and Niemiec, C.P., 2009. Self-determination theory in schools of education: Can an empirically supported framework also be critical and liberating?. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), pp.263-272.

Take a deeper dive into Examination of Two Research Papers for Evidence-Based Practice with our additional resources.